top of page
Search

Immigration Invasion

  • Writer: 17GEN4
    17GEN4
  • Sep 25, 2023
  • 27 min read

Updated: Feb 6



Anti-deportation, anti-Trump protests across America:


California: 

  • On February 2, 2025, a large-scale anti-mass deportation protest took place in downtown Los Angeles, beginning at Olvera Street. Participants, numbering in the thousands, carried Mexican flags and banners with pro-immigration messages, chanting against the administration's policies. This demonstration led to the temporary closure of the 101 Freeway. Another protest in San Diego on the same date started at the San Diego Convention Center, moving through the Gaslamp Quarter to the "Coming Together" sculpture at Park Boulevard.


  • Alabama: 

    • Albertville saw an anti-mass deportation demonstration on January 29, 2025, where protesters used bilingual slogans like "nobody is illegal on stolen land."


  • Texas: 

    • Protests have erupted in cities like Dallas, Fort Worth, and Austin. On January 26, concurrent demonstrations drew hundreds in Dallas and Fort Worth. In Austin, on February 1, a protest was organized against the construction of what was believed to be a future ICE operations center in Pflugerville.


  • Georgia: 

    • On February 1, around 1,000 protesters gathered on Buford Highway in metro Atlanta, leading to temporary road blockages.


  • Illinois: 

    • Chicago saw a demonstration on January 25, initially planned for Trump's inauguration but postponed due to weather. Protesters marched from Water Tower Place to Trump Tower.


  • Missouri: 

    • St. Louis had a significant protest on February 1 with about 1,000 participants protesting enhanced deportation efforts, following an ICE raid at a local restaurant.


  • Oklahoma: 

    • Tulsa hosted a protest on February 2 along Riverside Drive, where over 400 people gathered to oppose recent immigration policy changes.


  • South Carolina: 


    • Charleston experienced protests where numbers quickly exceeded local laws for un-permitted gatherings, leading to arrests.


  • Arkansas, Colorado, and other states also had smaller or less documented protests, but the sentiment against Trump's immigration policies, particularly the mass deportations, was widespread.


2/6/2025 -

__________


__________

The Trump administration has terminated the CBP One app, which had been instrumental in allowing millions of illegal aliens to enter the United States through scheduled appointments at ports of entry. This action was executed shortly after Donald Trump's inauguration, with reports confirming that all existing appointments were canceled. This move has left many migrants in Mexico in a state of distress, as they had been relying on these appointments for their legal entry into the U.S.


The discontinuation of the CBP One app aligns with Trump's campaign promises to implement stricter immigration policies, including the reinforcement of the 'Remain in Mexico' policy, where asylum seekers are required to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in the U.S. This immediate change has significant implications for those who were expecting to use the app for legal entry, potentially leading to increased attempts at crossing the border illegally or remaining in precarious conditions in Mexico.


The decision to end the app's functionality has been met with criticism for its abruptness and the lack of alternative solutions for those affected, while supporters argue it's a necessary step towards border security. This policy shift is part of a broader set of executive actions intended to fulfill Trump's promise of a stringent immigration crackdown.


The discontinuation of the CBP One app by the Trump administration has had several immediate and potentially long-term impacts on migrants:


  1. Cancellation of Appointments: All scheduled appointments for migrants to legally present themselves at U.S. ports of entry for asylum processing have been voided, leaving many without a clear path to legal entry. This sudden change has caused confusion and distress among those who had been waiting, often for months, to secure these appointments.

  2. Increased Uncertainty and Danger: Migrants who were counting on the app for a structured entry process now face increased uncertainty about their legal options for asylum. This situation might push some to attempt illegal crossings, exposing them to greater risks from human smugglers, harsh environmental conditions, and potential harm in Mexico while waiting for alternative avenues.

  3. Humanitarian Concerns: The abrupt shutdown has led to emotional distress among migrants, with reports of individuals crying upon hearing the news of their canceled appointments. This adds to the already challenging humanitarian situation at the border, where migrants are often living in makeshift camps or shelters with limited resources.

  4. Legal and Policy Implications: The policy shift back to 'Remain in Mexico' means asylum seekers must stay in Mexico during the processing of their claims, which can take months or years. This policy has been criticized for increasing the vulnerability of migrants to violence, extortion, and kidnapping by criminal elements in Mexico.

  5. Access to Asylum: The cessation of the CBP One app as the primary method for scheduling asylum appointments severely restricts access to asylum processes. Critics argue that this violates international human rights obligations, which require states to provide accessible means for individuals to seek asylum without undue hardship.

  6. Strategic Shifts: Migrants might now need to explore alternative legal pathways or wait for new policies or systems to be established, if any. This could lead to a backlog in processing as new methods are implemented or existing ones are scaled back to handle the influx of cases without the app's streamlined approach.

  7. Public and Political Reaction: The decision has sparked both support and backlash. Supporters of the move see it as a necessary action to control immigration, while critics view it as harsh and potentially inhumane, increasing the likelihood of undocumented entry due to desperation.



The assertion that legitimate claims of asylum cannot currently be recognized by the U.S. due to millions of false claims is a complex issue with various dimensions. Here's an explanation based on current discussions and policy implications:


Overwhelming the System:

  • Volume of Claims: The system is strained by the sheer number of asylum claims, whether legitimate or not. With many claims, processing times increase significantly, leading to backlogs in the asylum system. This backlog can delay the adjudication of all asylum cases, including those that are legitimate. For example, posts on X have suggested high rates of fraudulent claims, with figures like 86% or 97% of claims being illegitimate.

  • Resource Allocation: The resources of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and immigration courts are finite. When there's an influx of false claims, these resources are diverted to processing these claims, which could otherwise be used to more efficiently assess legitimate asylum seekers. This can lead to longer wait times for everyone.


Fraud and Abuse:

  • Systemic Fraud: There's a perception, and in some cases, documented instances where the system is abused for economic or other non-asylum related reasons. This abuse can lead to stricter policies or scrutiny that inadvertently affects legitimate claimants. For instance, policies like the "Remain in Mexico" were partly justified by the need to manage what was seen as an overwhelming number of potentially fraudulent claims.

  • Credible Fear Interviews: The initial screening process, known as the credible fear interview, is meant to weed out frivolous or unfounded claims. However, with an increase in claims, there's pressure to expedite these interviews, potentially at the cost of in-depth analysis, which might affect the accuracy of distinguishing between legitimate and fraudulent claims.


Policy Response:

  • Tighter Restrictions: In response to perceived abuse, policies have been enacted that aim to deter false claims but can also make it harder for genuine asylum seekers to navigate the system. For example, changes in policy that require asylum seekers to apply for asylum in countries they transit through before reaching the U.S., or the imposition of expedited removal processes, can complicate or block legitimate claims.

  • Legal and Procedural Barriers: With concerns over abuse, there have been efforts to increase the stringency of asylum criteria or to expedite removals, which might not allow enough time or resources for thorough investigation into the legitimacy of claims. This includes policies like Title 42 or the Asylum Transit Ban, which have been criticized for undermining asylum rights.


Public and Political Perception:

  • Skepticism: There's a growing skepticism towards asylum claims among some segments of the public and policymakers, influenced by narratives of system abuse. This skepticism can translate into less sympathetic policy-making or a tougher stance on immigration, impacting the treatment of all asylum seekers.

  • Political Influence: Immigration policy often becomes a political football, with debates over asylum often focusing on perceived abuse rather than the humanitarian aspect. This can lead to policies that are less about recognizing legitimate claims and more about deterring migration in general.


While the system is not entirely incapable of recognizing legitimate claims, the scale of fraudulent claims or perceived abuse can lead to inefficiencies, policy changes, and resource misallocation that make it more challenging for legitimate asylum seekers to have their claims processed fairly and in a timely manner. The actual impact varies, but the overarching narrative is that the system's integrity is compromised, affecting its ability to serve those genuinely in need of protection. However, it's crucial to approach such statements with caution, recognizing that while abuse does occur, the system still processes many legitimate claims annually, though under considerable strain.


Here are some detailed statistics related to the U.S. asylum system based on available information, though it should be noted that exact numbers on "false" claims are contentious and not always publicly or officially documented:


Asylum Applications and Processing:

  • Pending Asylum Cases: According to a post on X from December 26, 2022, nearly 1.6 million asylum applications were pending in U.S. immigration courts and at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), representing the largest number of pending asylum cases on record at that time.

  • CBP One App Usage: Before its discontinuation, the CBP One app had facilitated over 636,600 migrant entries through appointments at ports of entry since its inception. This was part of a broader policy allowing over 1 million migrants into the U.S. through the app and mass parole flights.

  • Monthly Appointments: From January 2023 to June 2023, over 170,000 individuals had successfully scheduled appointments through the CBP One app to present themselves at U.S. ports of entry.


Success Rates and Outcomes:

  • Approval Rates: Historical data from various sources shows that the grant rate for asylum has varied. For instance, in FY 2019, the asylum grant rate in immigration courts was about 29%, but this can fluctuate based on policy changes, judicial discretion, and the specifics of each case.

  • Parole and Release: A significant number of migrants with CBP One appointments were paroled into the U.S. Between January 12, 2023, and September 30, 2023, 95.8% of those who scheduled appointments via the app were issued a Notice to Appear and released into the U.S. on parole.


Claims of Abuse:

  • Figures on False Claims: There's no official statistic on the exact number of "false" asylum claims, as this is a highly debated topic. Claims of high percentages (like 86% or 97% being illegitimate) often come from political rhetoric or specific studies with limited scope. These numbers are not necessarily reflective of the overall situation. For instance, a 2023 report by the House Committee on Homeland Security claimed a high parole rate among CBP One users, suggesting a potential for system abuse, but this does not directly equate to false claims.

  • CBP One App and Parole: In the same period mentioned, specific nationalities had high parole rates, like 16 out of 18 Iranians, 32 out of 36 Chinese, 229 out of 246 Afghans, and 1,866 out of 2,279 Uzbeks, raising questions about vetting processes and the potential for system abuse. However, these statistics do not inherently indicate false asylum claims but rather the use of parole to manage entries.


Backlog and Wait Times:

  • Backlog Growth: The backlog of asylum cases has grown significantly over the years. From 27,256 cases at the end of 2018 to 132,182 by the end of 2022, including family members, which shows the system's increasing pressure.

  • Wait Times: With the backlog, wait times for asylum decisions have extended. Before the CBP One app was discontinued, some migrants waited months for an appointment, suggesting long-term waits even for initial processing.


Note on Data Interpretation:

  • These statistics offer a snapshot of the asylum process but should be interpreted with caution. The narrative of "false claims" often stems from political debate rather than from comprehensive, universally agreed-upon data. The complexity of asylum adjudication, including the need to assess each claim's merits individually, means that broad generalizations about legitimacy are challenging.

  • Changes in policy, like the cessation of the CBP One app, directly impact how migrants engage with the asylum system but don't directly correlate with the number of false claims; rather, they reflect broader immigration policy and enforcement strategies.


left-wing positioning


The claim that one cannot offer humanitarian aid to people who lack moral values or are dishonest is a complex ethical issue that intersects with moral philosophy, humanitarian principles, and practical considerations. Here's how this argument can be unpacked:


Humanitarian Principles:

  • Neutrality and Impartiality: Humanitarian aid operates on the principles of neutrality (not taking sides in hostilities) and impartiality (aid given based on need alone). According to these principles, the moral character of individuals does not factor into the decision to provide aid. The primary aim is to alleviate human suffering, regardless of who the individuals are or what they've done.

  • Human Dignity: Humanitarian aid is rooted in the belief in the inherent dignity of every human being. Even if someone has acted immorally or dishonestly, they are still considered deserving of basic human rights, including the right to life, health, and shelter.


Moral and Ethical Considerations:

  • Moral Relativism vs. Absolutism: From a moral relativist's perspective, what constitutes "moral values" can vary greatly by culture or personal belief, making it problematic to judge others by one's own moral standards. Conversely, a moral absolutist might argue for withholding aid based on perceived moral failings, but this approach clashes with humanitarian ethics.

  • Potential for Change: Offering aid might not be about endorsing the behavior of the recipient but providing a chance for moral or personal growth. Even those who have lied or acted immorally might change given the right circumstances, including support and aid.


Practical Considerations:

  • Verification of Claims: Determining who is lying or lacks moral values is extraordinarily challenging. Asylum and humanitarian aid processes often rely on the veracity of claims, but these are assessed through interviews, documentation, and sometimes corroboration from other sources, not personal morality.

  • Consequences of Withholding Aid: If aid were withheld based on moral assessments, it would likely lead to suffering among those genuinely in need. The risk of misjudging someone's moral character or the truthfulness of their claims is high, potentially leading to unjust outcomes.

  • Humanitarian Crisis Management: In situations like natural disasters, conflicts, or mass displacement, the immediate need is to save lives and reduce suffering. Delaying or denying aid based on moral judgments could exacerbate the crisis.


Legal and Policy Frameworks:

  • International Law: International humanitarian law and human rights conventions do not make the provision of aid contingent upon the moral character of recipients. Instead, they emphasize the protection of all individuals in need.

  • Refugee and Asylum Law: These laws focus on the persecution faced by individuals, not their moral conduct. The principle is to protect those fleeing harm, even if some among them might not be entirely truthful about their reasons for seeking asylum.



While one might personally feel that those who lie or lack moral values do not deserve aid, the humanitarian sector operates on principles that aim to transcend these judgments to focus on human need. The reality is that humanitarian aid is not meant to be a reward for good behavior but a response to human suffering. The complexities of human behavior, the potential for redemption or change, and the overarching goal of alleviating suffering mean that aid is not typically withheld due to moral judgments. However, this does not preclude accountability for criminal actions or the establishment of systems to ensure aid reaches those most in need based on accurate assessments.


1/21/2025 -

__________













Tragic Loss in Harris County: 7-Year-Old Ivory Smith Killed in Drunk Driving Incident


HARRIS COUNTY, Texas — A somber cloud hangs over northeast Harris County following the tragic death of 7-year-old Ivory Giselle Smith, who was killed in a horrific drunk driving crash on the morning of December 1, 2024. The incident has left the community in mourning and has sparked a renewed conversation about road safety and the consequences of driving under the influence.


Ivory, a second-grade student at Klenk Elementary School in Klein ISD, was a passenger in a car driven by her mother, Christina, when their vehicle was struck by a car operated by Joel Gonzalez Chacin, a 41-year-old Venezuelan national. The crash occurred at the intersection of Bammel North Houston Road and the Sam Houston Parkway around 2:45 a.m.


According to reports, Chacin was allegedly driving while intoxicated when he ran a red light, leading to the fatal collision. Ivory succumbed to her injuries, while her mother was severely injured and remains in critical condition in the hospital, facing a long road to recovery which includes surgery and physical therapy.


Shockingly, instead of rendering aid at the scene, Chacin is accused of taking photographs of the crash before attempting to leave the area. He was subsequently arrested and charged with felony intoxicated vehicular manslaughter. His bond has been set at $150,000, and an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainer has been placed on him due to his immigration status.


The community, along with Ivory's family, has been left devastated by the loss of a child described as full of life and personality, with a love for gymnastics. A GoFundMe has been established to help with funeral expenses and support for Christina during her recovery, emphasizing Ivory's bright spirit and the profound impact she had on those around her.


This tragic event has prompted local authorities to reiterate the dangers of drunk driving, with officials and community leaders calling for stricter enforcement of DWI laws and more robust public education campaigns to prevent such needless loss of life.


The investigation into the crash continues, with authorities piecing together the events that led to this heartbreaking incident. The Harris County Sheriff's Office and Constable Mark Herman's Office are involved in the ongoing inquiry.


12/12/2024 -

__________













__________











An illegal alien from Haiti, charged in the brutal r*pe of a 15-year-old Boston girl, is OUT OF JAIL after a liberal judge granted him bail. He was released into the country last year under Joe Biden's "parole" program.





__________


__________

An individual "has been charged with s-xual battery involving three girls and a woman" at a Virginia WATER PARK


The latest update on this incident is that the suspect, identified as Ziaulhaq Faqiri, appeared in court via video call on June 19, 2024. He is facing charges of s-xual battery and aggravated s-xual battery in connection with the incident at the Water Country USA wave pool in York County, Virginia. During the court appearance, Faqiri required a Dari translator and the topic of hiring a lawyer was addressed. His next court date is set for July 17 at 11 a.m. for his preliminary hearing.



___________




__________

6/20/2024 - NEW: Per CBP sources & internal CBP data, there have been at least 194,000 known gotaways recorded at our southern border since fiscal year 2024 began on October 1st, w/ an average of 500+ per day over the last week. El Paso & Tucson sectors have the most. El Paso sector includes New Mexico, and most of the sector’s gotaways are in the Santa Teresa, NM area. There have been more than 1.8 million gotaways at the border under President Biden’s administration according to this data, combined with CBP internal data obtained via Freedom of Information Act.


__________





__________



__________







































Sham Tough-on-Migrants Policies Launch in New York City and Chicago - Officials in New York City and Chicago are feeling the political heat over their policies giving billions of tax dollars to illegal aliens while taking benefits away from their citizens, and now both cities are pushing policies that may lead people to assume they are toughening their stance on illegals. But a close look at the policies shows what a sham these ballyhooed policies really are.





















________________

________________


















________________________________________________






















__________



__________








1/28/24


Illegal immigration affects the low-skilled low-wage workforce ensuring that wages will be kept low. Legal immigration through H-1B visas ensure the same in other industries. The replacement. Families are now prioritized over military aged men while neither group is seeking asylum whether it be from economic or other conflict.


Military aged men - why is that the description of those individuals? Are we looking to continue to build a larger or diverse military? After what just happened in Afghanistan? Are we bringing all of these people over here to join our military and fight their home countries with our weapons?


Old Republican white men in Congress do not defend their own people. The people who look like them. The people they say they represent. All of the other groups do. Obama did and Nikki Haley will. She is already going against the party.


It seems the best way to ensure the border remains wide open is to re-elect the guy that promised to close it 8 years ago. This politcal theater is all for show in an election year while the same people promising to the close the border now stopped that from happening 8 years ago while they are trying to prosecute the guy who was elected on the promise that he would close the border 8 years ago.




































Border patrol is just doing what they are told. What makes you think a Senator Kari Lake wil be able to do anything about this? She won't. The governor that she lost the election to is still going to allow this to happen, just like Greg Abbott in Texas has been doing.


Is Kari Lake trying to say that only presidential and gubernatorial elections are rigged?












































9/30/23 - 260,000 migrants cross the border this month - Fox News













 
 
 

コメント

bottom of page