top of page
Writer's picture17GEN4

Vivek Ramaswamy: eminent domain for co2 pipelines is wrong and unconstitutional


Vivek Ramaswamy, a Republican presidential candidate, has strongly opposed the use of eminent domain to build carbon capture pipelines on private land. He believes that this practice is both illegal and unconstitutional.


Public Necessity Standard

Ramaswamy argues that the Fifth Amendment’s public use clause requires that private property be taken only for a public purpose. He claims that the construction of CO2 pipelines does not meet this standard, as it is a private endeavor driven by federal subsidies and not a public necessity.


Iowa’s Supreme Court Ruling

Ramaswamy cites Iowa’s Supreme Court ruling, which holds that a project must serve the “public … necessity” to take land. He believes that job creation and economic growth are not sufficient reasons to justify the use of eminent domain for CO2 pipelines.


GOP Establishment Complicity

Ramaswamy criticizes the GOP establishment for being complicit in the unconstitutional seizure of private property. He claims that other presidential candidates, including Ron DeSantis, have shamefully sidestepped this issue.


Pledge to Withhold Federal Subsidies

If elected, Ramaswamy pledges to withhold federal subsidies from any recipient that uses eminent domain to build CO2 pipelines. He believes that this practice sets a dangerous precedent and could lead to the government seizing private property for other purposes.


Vivek Ramaswamy’s stance on eminent domain for CO2 pipelines is clear: he believes it is both illegal and unconstitutional. He is committed to protecting private property rights and opposing the use of eminent domain for private endeavors. 17GEN4.com




1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page