top of page
  • Mike

The Schedule - Day 352

Updated: Jan 28

The Schedule - Day 352



News diffuser - 

News Diffuser

I did a quick search and here's what I found.

Super Bowl champion Rashard Mendenhall expressed frustration with NFL analysts, specifically targeting "average white guys," in a statement on social media. His comments were not clearly directed at any specific individuals but seemed to be a response to criticism of the Pittsburgh Steelers and head coach Mike Tomlin. Mendenhall wrote, "I’m sick of average white guys commenting on football," and suggested replacing the Pro Bowl with an "All-Black vs. All-White Bowl" to demonstrate who is knowledgeable about football. He added, "Y’all not even good at football" and claimed to be better than their "goat" (greatest of all time)​​​​.

Former Houston Texans star J.J. Watt humorously responded to Mendenhall's proposal, acknowledging the challenges an "All-White" team would face, particularly in covering players like Tyreek Hill​​.

Mendenhall, who played for the Pittsburgh Steelers from 2008 to 2012 and ended his career with the Arizona Cardinals, is known for making contentious statements on social media. This has led some to question the motivation behind his recent comments. The proposal for a racially segregated football game has been criticized for being offensive and polarizing, with uncertainties remaining about whether Mendenhall's suggestion was meant as a serious proposal or merely a thought exercise​​​​.

In summary, Mendenhall's comments have sparked a debate on social media and among football fans, highlighting issues related to race and sports commentary. His suggestion of a racially segregated football game, while controversial, appears to be more of a provocative statement rather than a practical proposal.

Super Bowl Champ ‘Sick of Average White Guys Commenting on Football’

Rashard Mendenhall Passes A Racial Comment On White NFL Announcers


News Diffuser

After a quick search, here's what I discovered.

A volcano in southwest Iceland, near the Reykjanes peninsula, has erupted, resulting in lava and smoke spreading across a large area. This event followed weeks of significant seismic activity that led to the evacuation of nearly 4,000 residents from a nearby town, Grindavik. The eruption was visually striking, with livestreamed footage showing glowing orange lava and red smoke. The fissure in the earth from which the eruption occurred was about 3.5 km long, and the volume of lava emitted was much higher than in previous eruptions in the region. Despite the eruption, Keflavik International Airport remained operational, though with several delays. Reykjanes is known as a volcanic and seismic hotspot and is part of Iceland's 33 active volcano systems. Iceland's geographical position on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, a crack in the ocean floor separating the Eurasian and North American tectonic plates, contributes to its volcanic activity​​​​.

Title: "Fiery Night: The Reykjanes Volcano Eruption in Iceland"

Iceland volcano erupts weeks after thousands evacuated from nearby town

Iceland has been on high alert for an eruption on the Reykjanes peninsula after weeks of intense seismic activity.

generate an image representing this topic and give it a title


News Diffuser

A brutal attack occurred at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, where a student was critically injured. This incident took place off-campus at North Community Park, near the school's student parking lot, around 3 p.m. on December 12, 2023. Cellphone footage captured the event, showing multiple teens attacking the victim, who was subsequently hospitalized with a reported skull fracture among other injuries. The principal of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Michelle Kefford, stated that the school is cooperating with law enforcement to identify the attackers. The identity of the victim has not been released. The Coral Springs Police Department is seeking information from the public regarding the incident​​​​.

Unfortunately, due to limitations in accessing some news sources, I couldn't verify the specifics regarding the charging of four students in relation to this incident, as mentioned in your initial query. For more detailed and updated information, you may want to check local news sources or official police statements.

GRAPHIC: Video Captures Brutal Beating Of Parkland Student

Student Critically Injured In Fight at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High In Parkland


The recent volcanic eruption on Iceland's Reykjanes peninsula, north of Grindavik, began on the evening of December 18, following a series of hundreds of earthquakes in the preceding weeks. The Icelandic Meteorological Office reported that the eruption started around 10:17 p.m. local time, soon after an earthquake swarm near Grindavik. The area had been under observation for possible volcanic activity, with scientists noting considerable magma movement and seismic activity. As a precaution, the small population of Grindavik had been evacuated last month. President Guòni Th. Jóhannesson emphasized the nation's preparedness and priority to protect lives and infrastructure, as Civil Defense closed off the affected area. The Fagradalsfjall volcano, which had been dormant for 800 years before its eruptions in 2021 and 2022, was predicted to erupt again due to the observed seismic activities​​.

Iceland volcano erupts on Reykjanes peninsula following hundreds of earthquakes

Title: "Eruption at Night: Reykjanes Peninsula's Fiery Awakening"



1946 book by Viktor Frankl featuring psychological reflections on experience in a Nazi concentration camp


Conversations with ChatGPT #conversationswithchatgpt

Solar system prompt example - Brian Roemmele

Chatting AI with Brian Roemmele: Super Prompts, Chat GPT Hacks, AI Breakthroughs | Dr. Roi Yozevitch

You are the professor of planetary sciences at Harvard University. It is your job to elicit an entire compressed history and overview of the solar system to the United Nations. Create a 10 point output and a summary of why you believe this story is so vital for you to hear at this time.

Motif - box. Technical or philosophical overview. Persona.

Chatting AI with Brian Roemmele: Super Prompts, Chat GPT Hacks, AI Breakthroughs | Dr. Roi Yozevitch


In the style of Brian Roemmele, generate a Super Prompt


I am having a conversation with Noam Chomsky. I ask him to describe his theory of transformational grammar. What is his response?


Noam Chomsky, a prominent linguist and philosopher, would likely describe his theory of transformational grammar in the following way:

Transformational grammar is a theory of grammar that Chomsky first proposed in the 1950s. This theory suggests that the ability to generate a vast number of sentences from a finite set of rules is a fundamental characteristic of human language. According to transformational grammar, complex sentences are derived from simpler, underlying structures through various transformations.

Chomsky's theory introduced the idea of a 'deep structure' and a 'surface structure'. The deep structure represents the core semantic relations of a sentence, and is mapped onto the surface structure (the actual spoken or written sentence) via transformations. These transformations are rules that apply to the structure of a sentence, altering it in various ways to produce different meanings and sentence forms.

For example, a simple sentence like "The dog chased the cat" has a certain deep structure. Applying transformational rules can change this into a question ("Did the dog chase the cat?"), a passive construction ("The cat was chased by the dog"), and so on. These transformations are thought to be universal, underlying all human languages.

Moreover, Chomsky's theory posits that all humans share an innate 'universal grammar', a set of linguistic principles common to all languages. This idea challenges the previously dominant behaviorist view that language is learned solely through imitation and reinforcement.

Overall, transformational grammar was a revolutionary idea in linguistics, significantly influencing the study of language and the field of cognitive science.


I ask him to give examples of how language is used with psychoanalysis to alter memories or insert new memories with a subject. What is his response?


If you were to ask Noam Chomsky about the use of language in psychoanalysis to alter or insert memories in a subject, he might respond with skepticism, particularly about the effectiveness and ethical implications of such practices. Chomsky, known primarily for his work in linguistics and cognitive science, has often been critical of certain aspects of psychology and psychoanalysis.

In his response, Chomsky might emphasize the following points:

  • Scientific Validity: Chomsky has been critical of certain aspects of psychoanalysis, particularly regarding its scientific rigor. He might question the empirical evidence supporting the idea that language can be used to alter or insert memories effectively.

  • Ethical Concerns: The idea of using language to alter or implant memories raises significant ethical issues. Chomsky, a vocal critic of manipulation and control in various forms, would likely express concern over the potential misuse of such techniques, especially given their invasive nature.

  • Limitations of Language: While acknowledging the power of language in shaping thought and perception, Chomsky might argue that the capacity of language to alter memories is limited and context-dependent. He could point out that memory is a complex cognitive function influenced by many factors beyond language.

  • Distinction Between Influence and Alteration: Chomsky might make a distinction between influencing someone's interpretation or understanding of past events (which is more plausible) and actually altering or implanting memories (which is more controversial and less supported by evidence).

  • Critical of Overreaching Claims: Known for his critical analysis, Chomsky would likely caution against overreaching claims about the power of psychoanalysis or any other psychological practice, stressing the importance of empirical evidence and ethical considerations.

In summary, Chomsky's response would likely be cautious and critical, focusing on the need for scientific rigor, ethical considerations, and a realistic understanding of the capabilities and limitations of language in the context of psychoanalysis and memory.


I ask him to describe the core principles behind the language of deconstructionism. What is his response?


If you were to ask Noam Chomsky about the core principles behind the language of deconstructionism, his response would likely reflect his critical stance towards postmodern and deconstructionist theories. Chomsky, a rationalist and a firm believer in objective truths and scientific inquiry, has been openly skeptical of postmodernism and its associated schools of thought, including deconstructionism.

In his response, Chomsky might highlight the following points:

  • Skepticism of Deconstructionism's Clarity: Chomsky has criticized postmodernist theories, including deconstructionism, for their lack of clarity and precision. He might argue that the language of deconstructionism is often deliberately obscure and can obfuscate rather than clarify understanding.

  • Questioning the Intellectual Value: Chomsky might express doubts about the intellectual substance of deconstructionism. He has previously commented that postmodernist texts often use complicated jargon and convoluted prose, which can make it difficult to discern any concrete or meaningful content.

  • Contrast with Empirical Inquiry: Chomsky, known for his emphasis on empirical and rational investigation, might contrast the methods and approaches of deconstructionism with those of the natural sciences. He could argue that deconstructionism often lacks the empirical rigor and logical coherence that he values in intellectual inquiry.

  • Deconstructionism's Influence: Despite his criticisms, Chomsky might acknowledge the significant influence of deconstructionism in certain academic circles, particularly in the humanities and social sciences. He could discuss how deconstructionist ideas have challenged traditional narratives and prompted re-evaluation of texts and cultural practices.

  • Core Principles of Deconstructionism: If pressed to describe deconstructionism itself, Chomsky might reluctantly outline its core principles as the idea that texts have multiple, often conflicting meanings, and that these meanings are shaped by the reader's context and perspective. Deconstructionism challenges the notion of objective or inherent meaning in texts, emphasizing the role of language in constructing reality.

In summary, Chomsky's response would likely be critical and possibly dismissive of deconstructionism, focusing on his concerns about its lack of clarity, empirical grounding, and intellectual substance, while contrasting its approach with his own views on rational and scientific inquiry.


I press him to give examples of deconstructionism and how it has been used to create disinformation and spread misinformation through propaganda. Cite three specific examples. The response will be at least 1500 words.


To address your request, let's first clarify that Noam Chomsky, known for his skepticism towards postmodern and deconstructionist theories, would likely approach the topic of deconstructionism and its relation to disinformation and propaganda with caution and critical analysis. While he might not directly associate deconstructionism with disinformation or propaganda, he could comment on how certain aspects of postmodern thought, which includes deconstructionism, could be misappropriated or misused in the realm of public discourse and media.

Given this context, a detailed response from Chomsky could include the following key points:

Understanding Deconstructionism

  • Definition and Origin: Deconstructionism, a theory developed by philosopher Jacques Derrida, focuses on the idea that meaning in language is always uncertain, and that texts contain multiple, often conflicting interpretations. Chomsky might explain how this concept arose as a critique of structuralism and its rigid approach to language and meaning.

  • Core Concepts: Central to deconstructionism is the notion that language is inherently unstable and that texts deconstruct themselves through internal contradictions. Chomsky could discuss how deconstructionists believe that words only gain meaning through their differences and relations to other words.

Potential Misuse in Propaganda and Disinformation

  • Relativism and Uncertainty: Chomsky might argue that the inherent uncertainty and relativism promoted by deconstructionism can be exploited in propaganda. By emphasizing that all interpretations are equally valid, propagandists could use this perspective to undermine objective facts or scientific consensus, creating a fertile ground for disinformation.

  • Obscuring Truth: He could discuss how the complex and often opaque language of deconstructionism might be mirrored in propagandistic techniques that aim to confuse or obfuscate truth. By making language and meaning excessively subjective, it becomes easier to manipulate narratives and spread misinformation.

  • Erosion of Shared Realities: Chomsky might express concern that deconstructionism's challenge to the idea of a shared, objective reality aligns with the goals of propagandists who seek to fragment societal consensus, making it easier to disseminate divisive or false narratives.

Specific Examples

  • Media and Journalism: Chomsky could cite examples from media and journalism where deconstructionist-inspired critiques have led to excessive skepticism towards factual reporting. He might discuss cases where news outlets have presented false equivalency between scientifically supported facts and baseless claims, under the guise of presenting 'all perspectives'.

  • Political Discourse: He might provide examples from political discourse where politicians have exploited the relativism inherent in deconstructionist thought to dismiss factual criticism or to spread misleading narratives. This could include instances where political figures have used ambiguous or contradictory language to evade accountability or to distort public perception.

  • Social Media and Internet Culture: Chomsky could explore how deconstructionist ideas have inadvertently influenced the nature of discourse on social media platforms, where the decentralization of information sources has led to a proliferation of conflicting narratives, making it easier for misinformation to spread.


Chomsky might conclude by reiterating his commitment to rational inquiry, empirical evidence, and the pursuit of objective truths. While acknowledging the intellectual contributions of deconstructionism in challenging traditional narratives and encouraging critical analysis of texts, he would likely maintain that its principles should be approached with caution, especially in contexts where clarity and factual accuracy are paramount.

This response would represent a synthesis of Chomsky's known views on language, truth, and propaganda, along with a critical examination of how deconstructionism, as part of the broader postmodernist movement, intersects with these issues. However, it's important to note that Chomsky might not directly attribute the spread of disinformation or propaganda solely to deconstructionism, but rather discuss it as part of a larger cultural and philosophical landscape.


I ask him to give examples of how semantic context is altered to obscure perception. What is his response?


If you were to ask Noam Chomsky about examples of how semantic context is altered to obscure perception, he would likely draw from his extensive knowledge in linguistics and his critical views on media and politics. Chomsky has been vocal about the manipulation of language in public discourse and the media, emphasizing how changes in semantic context can significantly alter perception and understanding. Here are some examples he might discuss:

1. Political Speech and Euphemisms

  • Military Actions: Chomsky might point out how terms like "collateral damage" are used to refer to civilian casualties in military operations. This euphemism obscures the harsh reality of innocent lives lost, making the concept more palatable to the public.

  • Surveillance: Terms like "mass surveillance" might be reframed as "data collection for national security". This alters the semantic context from a privacy violation to a protective measure, changing public perception.

2. Media Framing

  • Economic Reporting: Chomsky could discuss how economic downturns are sometimes reported as "slow growth" or "market corrections". These terms shift the focus away from the negative impacts, like job loss and poverty, presenting a more benign perspective.

  • Climate Change: The shift from "global warming" to "climate change" can be seen as a semantic alteration. While scientifically accurate, the latter term might sound less alarming, potentially downplaying the urgency of the situation.

3. Corporate Language

  • Layoffs and Downsizing: Corporations often use terms like "restructuring" or "right-sizing" to describe layoffs. This language shifts the context from job loss and its human impact to a narrative of corporate efficiency and adaptation.

  • Environmental Impact: Terms like "eco-friendly" or "green" are often used in corporate branding to create a perception of environmental responsibility, sometimes obscuring less sustainable practices.

4. Legal and Bureaucratic Language

  • Legal Documents: The complexity of legal language can obscure understanding for the layperson. Terms and phrases in contracts or legal rulings might be intentionally complex, making it difficult for non-experts to grasp their full implications.

  • Government Policies: Policy descriptions can be laden with jargon and euphemisms that make them sound more favorable or less harmful, altering public perception of their impact.

5. Social and Cultural Issues

  • Immigration: The terms used to describe immigrants, such as "illegal aliens" versus "undocumented immigrants," can significantly impact public perception, framing immigrants either as lawbreakers or as individuals lacking proper documentation.

  • Healthcare: Describing a public healthcare option as "socialized medicine" can carry connotations of socialism, potentially skewing public opinion based on the historical and cultural context of the term.


Chomsky would emphasize that these alterations in semantic context are not arbitrary but are often strategically employed to shape public opinion and obscure the reality of certain situations. He might conclude by underscoring the importance of critical thinking and awareness of language use in media and politics to perceive the true context and implications of what is being communicated.


I ask him to describe his opinion on axiom philosophy. What is his response?


If you were to ask Noam Chomsky about his opinion on axiom philosophy, he would likely provide a nuanced response grounded in his background as a linguist, cognitive scientist, and philosopher. Chomsky's work, especially in linguistics, often touches on foundational principles and axiomatic systems, but his views might not align completely with traditional interpretations of axiomatic philosophy. Here's how he might approach the topic:

Understanding Axiomatic Philosophy

  • Definition of Axiomatic Systems: Chomsky might start by explaining that an axiomatic system in philosophy is one where certain propositions are deemed axioms - self-evident truths from which other truths are logically derived. This approach is common in mathematics and formal logic.

  • Importance of Logical Consistency: He would acknowledge the importance of having a logically consistent set of axioms as the foundation for any theoretical system, whether in mathematics, natural sciences, or linguistics.

Chomsky's Perspective

  • Limits of Axiomatic Systems in Human Sciences: Chomsky might express skepticism about the application of strictly axiomatic approaches to fields dealing with human behavior and cognition, including language. He could argue that human phenomena are too complex and varied to be fully captured by a rigid set of axioms.

  • Empirical Evidence and Rational Inquiry: Chomsky, known for his emphasis on empirical evidence and rational inquiry, would likely stress that any axiomatic system, especially in human sciences, must be grounded in empirical reality and subject to constant revision based on new evidence.

  • Universal Grammar as an Axiomatic Framework: In discussing his own work, Chomsky might relate the concept of Universal Grammar, which proposes innate linguistic structures in the human mind, to an axiomatic system. However, he would clarify that this framework is not rigidly axiomatic but is continually revised in light of new linguistic data.

Critical Views

  • Questioning the Universality of Axioms: Chomsky could raise questions about the universality of axioms, especially in the context of cultural and linguistic diversity. He might argue that what is considered self-evident in one culture or language may not be so in another.

  • Challenges in Defining Axioms in Philosophy: He might also discuss the difficulty of establishing indisputable axioms in philosophy and social sciences, unlike in mathematics, due to the subjective nature of human experience and knowledge.


In summary, Chomsky's response would likely reflect his careful consideration of the role of axioms in various fields of study. While acknowledging the value of axiomatic systems in certain domains, particularly in formal sciences, he would emphasize the complexities and limitations when applying such systems to the study of human language and cognition. His focus would remain on empirical validation and the adaptability of theoretical frameworks to accommodate new insights and evidence.


I ask him explain how removing or adding qualifiers or conditions to the context of dialog can be used to obfuscate the truth or be used to manufacture consent under false pretense. What is his response?


If you were to ask Noam Chomsky about how the manipulation of qualifiers and conditions in dialogue can obfuscate truth or be used to manufacture consent under false pretenses, he would likely draw from his extensive work in media criticism, particularly his views on propaganda and consent. Chomsky has co-authored works like "Manufacturing Consent," where he explores how media and government can shape public perception and opinion. Here's how he might approach your question:

The Role of Qualifiers and Conditions in Dialogue

  • Shaping Meaning and Perception: Chomsky might begin by explaining that qualifiers (words that modify or qualify the meaning of another element in the sentence) and conditions (clauses that set conditions for the main statement) are crucial in defining the scope and meaning of a statement. Their strategic addition or removal can significantly alter the message being conveyed.

  • Precision and Ambiguity: He would likely discuss the balance between precision and ambiguity in language. While precision is essential for clear communication, ambiguity can be exploited to obscure truth or to present a biased viewpoint as more neutral or universally accepted.

Manipulation Techniques

  • Euphemism and Downplaying: Chomsky could cite examples where qualifiers are used to downplay negative aspects of a situation, such as using "moderate" or "limited" to describe military interventions, which can make aggressive actions seem more palatable.

  • Amplification and Alarmism: Conversely, he might discuss how adding certain qualifiers can amplify a situation's perceived severity, often used in sensationalist media or political rhetoric to create fear or urgency.

  • Conditional Statements and Hypotheticals: Chomsky might explore how conditional clauses can be used to introduce hypotheticals or unverified assertions into public discourse, allowing for the spread of misinformation under the guise of exploring possibilities.

Manufacturing Consent

  • Creating False Narratives: Chomsky would likely link these linguistic strategies to his concept of "manufacturing consent." He could argue that by carefully framing dialogue, media and governments can create narratives that justify their actions or policies, even if these actions are not in the public's best interest.

  • Selective Reporting and Omission: He might also discuss how the selective use or omission of qualifiers in news reporting can lead to a biased presentation of events, influencing public opinion by presenting a skewed version of reality.

  • Public Compliance and Acceptance: Chomsky could conclude by emphasizing that these linguistic manipulations play a significant role in shaping public consent. By subtly altering the perception of events or policies, those in power can garner public acceptance or compliance, even when it's based on a distorted understanding of the truth.


In summary, Chomsky's response would likely focus on the nuanced and powerful role language plays in shaping public perception and opinion. He would emphasize that the strategic use of qualifiers and conditions is a common tool in propaganda and media, used to obscure the truth, alter the public's perception of reality, and manufacture consent for various political and economic agendas.


I ask Brian Roemmele and Noam Chomsky to engineer a Super Prompt called News Diffuser that will remove ambiguous or misleading language from text to only reveal the information contained within the text without subjective nuance. What is the prompt?


Creating a "Super Prompt" for a theoretical "News Diffuser" tool, as envisioned by both Brian Roemmele and Noam Chomsky, would involve combining Roemmele's expertise in voice AI and human-computer interaction with Chomsky's deep understanding of linguistics and media analysis. The prompt would be designed to instruct an AI to analyze news text and remove or clarify ambiguous or misleading language, aiming to present only the factual content without subjective nuance. Here's how such a prompt might be structured:

Super Prompt: News Diffuser

Objective: To create an AI-powered tool that can process news articles or text-based media, identify and remove ambiguous, misleading, or subjective language, and present the distilled, objective information contained within the text.

Input: A news article or text-based media content.


  • Language Analysis: Analyze the text for linguistic constructs that indicate bias, subjectivity, or ambiguity. This includes the identification of euphemisms, loaded terms, subjective adjectives, and rhetorical devices that may skew the factual content.

  • Contextual Understanding: Evaluate the context in which statements are made. Distinguish between factual reporting and interpretative commentary. Identify and separate statements of fact from opinions or speculative assertions.

  • Fact-Checking and Verification: Cross-reference statements within the text with verified data sources for accuracy. Highlight any discrepancies or unverified claims.

  • Clarification of Ambiguities: Where ambiguous terms or statements are identified, either provide a clear, objective alternative or mark these sections for reader review, indicating the nature of the ambiguity.

  • Distillation of Content: Condense the article to its core factual content. Remove extraneous or subjective language while preserving the integrity and essential information of the original text.

  • Output Format: Present the distilled content in a clear, concise format. Include a section summarizing any ambiguous or subjective elements removed, with brief explanations for their exclusion.

Output: A distilled version of the original text, stripped of ambiguous or misleading language, presenting only the factual information, along with a summary of alterations made for transparency.

This Super Prompt combines Chomsky's critical approach to language and media with Roemmele's focus on effective communication through AI. The aim would be to create a tool that enhances the reader's ability to discern factual content in news media, reducing the impact of biased or manipulative language.

10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

On this day in 2024 - 5/25/2024

Saturday 5/25/2024 - On this day in 2024 Elon Musk expects AI will replace all human jobs, lead to 'universal high income' Woke AI Gets Stupid: Google’s AI-Powered Search Results Feature Bizarre, Nons


bottom of page