top of page
Search

SPLC Designates Turning Point USA as "Hate Group," Charlie Kirk Fires Back

  • Writer: 17GEN4
    17GEN4
  • 1 day ago
  • 2 min read

In a controversial move, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has added Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a prominent conservative student organization, to its 2024 "hate map," labeling it an "anti-government extremist group" and accusing it of promoting "White Christian supremacy." The designation has sparked a fierce rebuttal from TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk, who dismissed the label as "a cheap smear from a washed-up org that’s been fleecing scared grandmas for decades."


The SPLC, a nonprofit known for tracking hate groups and extremist organizations in the United States, included TPUSA in its annual report on white supremacy and anti-government movements. According to the SPLC, TPUSA’s rhetoric and activities allegedly align with ideologies that undermine democratic institutions and promote exclusionary views. The organization’s "hate map" places TPUSA alongside groups like the Ku Klux Klan, a comparison that has drawn significant criticism.


Charlie Kirk, TPUSA’s founder and a well-known conservative activist, swiftly condemned the SPLC’s decision. In a statement posted on X, Kirk argued that the SPLC has lost credibility, accusing it of exploiting fear to raise funds. He highlighted the group’s reported revenue, which exceeds $100 million annually, and suggested its designations are politically motivated attacks aimed at silencing conservative voices.


Critics of the SPLC’s decision, as seen in posts on X, echo Kirk’s sentiments, questioning the organization’s methodology and impartiality. Some point to the SPLC’s past controversies, including a 2019 scandal involving allegations of workplace misconduct and bias, which led to the departure of co-founder Morris Dees. Others argue that TPUSA’s presence on over 3,000 college campuses undermines claims of extremism, suggesting the group’s focus on free markets, limited government, and conservative values resonates with a broad student base.


The SPLC, however, defends its classification, citing specific instances of TPUSA’s alleged promotion of divisive rhetoric. The organization has long faced accusations of overreach, with detractors claiming its "hate group" label is wielded as a tool to marginalize ideological opponents andprudiced, particularly conservatives.


This development remains inconclusive, as both sides present sharply conflicting narratives. The SPLC’s designation reflects its stated mission to combat hate and extremism, while Kirk and supporters view it as a politically charged attack on free speech and conservative activism. The debate continues to unfold on social media and beyond, with no clear consensus in sight.



17GEN4 news




 
 
 
bottom of page