top of page
  • Writer's picture17GEN4 AI TECH

Shadow AI - Q Star - Layer protocol

Updated: Feb 3

Search the web and tell me about shadow AI. Cite all sources including the full URLs to source material.



ChatGPT

After a quick search, here's what I found.


Shadow AI refers to the use of artificial intelligence systems and tools within an organization without formal approval or oversight from the IT department. This phenomenon is emerging as a significant challenge for businesses as AI technologies become more accessible and integrated into various functions. Shadow AI is similar to the concept of shadow IT but specifically pertains to AI-driven tools and solutions.


17GEN4 Tech
17GEN4 Tech

The rise of shadow AI is fueled by the democratization of technology, making it easier for individuals and teams to access and deploy AI solutions without the need for extensive training, expertise, or financial resources. While this trend can foster innovation and productivity, it also introduces several risks and challenges that organizations need to address:


  • Data Privacy and Security Risks: Shadow AI can lead to potential security breaches and data privacy violations. The use of unauthorized AI tools may not adhere to the stringent security protocols and data handling practices that IT departments typically enforce. This makes sensitive information vulnerable to cyberattacks and can result in compliance issues with regulations like GDPR and CCPA​​​​.


  • Compliance Challenges: Organizations may find themselves non-compliant with industry standards and regulations due to the unauthorized use of AI tools. The handling of data by shadow AI tools might contravene data privacy regulations, leading to legal repercussions and damage to the company's reputation​​.


  • Information Integrity and Trust Issues: Shadow AI tools might not undergo the same rigorous vetting and validation processes as officially sanctioned solutions, raising concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the data and insights they provide. This can lead to mistrust and misinformed decision-making within the organization​​​​.


  • Loss of Control and Oversight: The clandestine nature of shadow AI makes it challenging for IT departments to monitor and manage these tools effectively. This lack of oversight can result in a fragmented technology landscape, making it difficult to ensure consistency, security, and optimal performance across the organization​​.


Addressing the challenges of shadow AI requires a proactive and comprehensive approach. Organizations should develop robust AI governance frameworks, educate their employees about the risks and responsible use of AI, and establish clear policies and guidelines. It's also crucial to foster a culture of transparency and collaboration, ensuring that all AI initiatives align with the organization's goals, ethical standards, and compliance requirements​​​​​​​​.


In essence, while shadow AI presents several risks, it also offers opportunities for innovation and growth. By strategically managing shadow AI, organizations can harness its potential benefits while mitigating the associated risks.



You

Write out the complete URLs to the source references.



ChatGPT

Sure, here are the complete URLs to the sources referenced in the summary:



You

Search the web and find specific information about professionals within IT departments that may use shadow AI without a company's knowledge. Cite all sources including complete URLs to source material.



ChatGPT

I did a quick search and here's what I discovered.


Professionals within IT departments and other areas of an organization might resort to using shadow AI without the company's knowledge for a variety of reasons, often driven by a need to enhance productivity, automate repetitive tasks, or improve decision-making processes. However, this practice is not without its risks and complexities.


A survey conducted by ISACA, a professional association for IT governance, revealed that a significant number of employees are already using AI to create written content, automate tasks, and provide customer service, among other uses. Despite these widespread applications, only a small fraction of organizations have formal policies permitting AI's use or provide comprehensive AI training to their staff. This gap highlights the need for organizations to establish robust policies and governance frameworks to address ethical, privacy, and security concerns associated with AI, thereby mitigating the risks without stifling innovation and the benefits AI offers​​​​.


In the realm of cybersecurity, professionals may turn to shadow AI for tasks such as deobfuscating code, analyzing malicious code, or learning more about vulnerabilities and attack formats. This can provide valuable tools to aid their work but also introduces the risk of potential incorrect answers, over-reliance on AI tools, and unauthorized information disclosure, among other issues​​.


Identifying and managing shadow AI within an organization can be challenging. While crafting and communicating an AI policy is a step in the right direction, it's often not enough on its own. Active monitoring, periodic AI audits, network traffic analysis, and whistleblower mechanisms are more hands-on approaches that can help identify unauthorized AI use. However, strategies like blocking specific IP addresses associated with AI tools have their pitfalls and can hamper genuine research or innovation​​.


As the usage of shadow AI in the workplace continues to grow, organizations are urged to put guardrails around the use of AI technologies to ensure the security of corporate data and establish formal governance guidelines. Aligning employer policies with the proactive exploration and leveraging of generative AI by employees can enable organizations to harness the benefits of AI while safeguarding against related risks​​.



You

Write out the complete URLs to the source references.



ChatGPT

Certainly, here are the complete URLs to the sources referenced in the summary:




You

Search the web and tell me about the most recent information regarding the implementation of Einstein GPT with Salesforce.



ChatGPT

From a quick search, here's what I found.


Salesforce has taken a significant step forward in the realm of CRM technology with the introduction of Einstein GPT, recognized as the world's first generative AI for CRM. Launched in March 2023, Einstein GPT integrates Salesforce's proprietary AI models with generative AI from OpenAI and other large language models, aiming to revolutionize customer relationship management by enhancing interactions and automating processes at an unprecedented scale​​​​.


Einstein GPT is designed to create AI-generated content across various Salesforce clouds, thereby boosting productivity for every employee and enhancing the overall customer experience. This technology is open and extensible, supporting both public and private AI models, and is deeply integrated into the Salesforce ecosystem, including Tableau, MuleSoft, and Slack. It also collaborates with OpenAI's enterprise-grade ChatGPT technology, ensuring that the content generated is both relevant and trusted​​​​.


Key features of Einstein GPT include its ability to generate personalized emails, targeted content for marketing campaigns, and auto-generated code for developers, among others. This suite of capabilities is set to transform how companies interact with their customers, enabling more intelligent, automated, and personalized connections​​​​​​.


Additionally, Salesforce announced a substantial $250 million Generative AI Fund through Salesforce Ventures, aiming to invest in high-potential startups and fuel the growth of responsible, trusted, and generative AI​​​​.


Moreover, the integration of Einstein GPT with Data Cloud and Salesforce Flow is poised to further empower marketers by providing real-time, data-driven, personalized customer experiences. The dynamic nature of Data Cloud, combined with the conversational AI capabilities of Einstein GPT, enables the generation of content and workflows that adapt in real-time, leading to more effective and engaging marketing strategies​​.


To sum up, Salesforce's introduction of Einstein GPT marks a significant advancement in CRM technology, offering an array of benefits from enhancing productivity and customer experience to fostering innovation in the AI space. With its commitment to privacy and trust, Salesforce is setting a new industry standard for enterprise AI.



You

Write out the complete URLs to the source references.



ChatGPT

Certainly, here are the complete URLs to the sources referenced in the summary:





You

Search the web for the most recent information relating to Q Star, Sam Altman and OpenAI.



ChatGPT

I did a quick search and here's what I found.


Sam Altman's recent ousting and subsequent return as CEO of OpenAI has stirred significant curiosity in the AI community, particularly surrounding a new AI model known as Q Star (Q*). This model is speculated to be a breakthrough in AI technology, potentially steering OpenAI closer to achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). AGI represents a form of AI that can comprehend, learn, and apply knowledge in a manner that's not limited to specific tasks, mirroring human cognitive abilities across a broad spectrum of actions and subjects.


One of the intriguing aspects of Q* is its purported capability to solve mathematical problems at a grade-school level, a feat that, despite appearing modest, is highly significant. Mastery of math problems is seen as a core trait of AGI, as it necessitates an advanced level of reasoning and understanding that goes beyond simple data processing or pattern recognition. This capability of Q* has made researchers optimistic about its future applications and its potential role in pushing the boundaries of AI intelligence.


However, this advancement doesn't come without its concerns. The emergence of Q* prompted internal warnings about the potential risks associated with such a powerful AI, pointing to issues of AI safety and the possible consequences of deploying an AI with such advanced capabilities without fully comprehending its implications.


The revelations about Q* and the boardroom dynamics at OpenAI have added a layer of complexity to the ongoing discussions about AI regulation, governance, and the ethical development and deployment of AI technologies. While the exact capabilities and the nature of Q* are still largely under wraps, the discussions it has spurred reflect the broader challenges and considerations that the AI community, and society as a whole, will need to address as these technologies continue to evolve​​​​​​​​​​.



You

Write out the complete URLs to the source references.



ChatGPT

Certainly, here are the complete URLs to the sources referenced in the summary:



You

Explain how the controversy surrounding Sam Altman and OpenAI in late 2023 could have been caused by concerns related to Shadow AI such as generating misinformation and acting on it.



ChatGPT

The controversy surrounding Sam Altman and OpenAI in late 2023, particularly linked to the development of the Q Star (Q*) model, touches on broader concerns in the AI field, including issues typically associated with Shadow AI, such as generating misinformation and acting on it.


While the specifics of the Q* model and its capabilities remain mostly undisclosed, the model's development and the related boardroom dynamics at OpenAI have raised critical discussions about AI safety, ethical AI development, and governance. Shadow AI, a term that generally refers to AI systems or tools used within an organization without explicit approval or oversight, often raises concerns about misinformation, data privacy, security risks, and lack of compliance with regulatory standards.


  • Generating Misinformation: One of the significant worries about Shadow AI is the potential for generating misinformation. AI systems, if not properly supervised or if they lack robust ethical guidelines, can inadvertently create and spread false or misleading information. This concern is amplified with powerful AI models like Q*, which, due to their advanced capabilities, could potentially generate misinformation at a scale or sophistication previously unmanageable.


  • Acting on Misinformation: Beyond generating misinformation, there's the additional risk of AI systems acting upon such information, making decisions, or taking actions based on incorrect or biased data. This risk poses a significant concern, especially in models approaching AGI, where the decision-making process is more autonomous and far-reaching in its implications.


  • Safety and Control: The discussions around Q* and Sam Altman's temporary ousting highlight the ongoing debate about safety and control in AI development. The fear is not just about the AI systems generating misinformation but also about them evolving beyond the control of their creators, making decisions, or taking actions that were not intended or anticipated by the developers, thus posing potential threats to humanity.


  • Ethical and Governance Concerns: The situation also underscores the need for robust ethical frameworks and governance mechanisms in AI development. It's crucial to ensure that advancements in AI, especially those nearing AGI capabilities, are aligned with ethical standards and that there are proper oversight and regulatory measures to prevent misuse or unintended consequences.


In conclusion, while the specifics of the Q* model are not fully public, the controversy around Sam Altman and OpenAI reflects broader concerns in the AI industry. These concerns relate closely to issues of Shadow AI, including the risk of generating and acting on misinformation, the challenges of ensuring AI safety and control, and the importance of ethical development and governance in AI​​​​​​.



You

Write out the complete URLs to the source references.



ChatGPT

Certainly, here are the complete URLs to the sources referenced in the summary:




You

Explain how data exchanged between public and private cloud based AI systems can be kept secure when a private AI for CRM interacts with a public AI system used by the individual customer to act as a personal assistant.



ChatGPT

Ensuring the security of data exchanged between public and private cloud-based AI systems, especially when a private AI for CRM interacts with a public AI system used by individual customers as a personal assistant, involves multiple layers of security measures and best practices:


  • Data Encryption: Data in transit between public and private cloud systems should be encrypted using strong encryption protocols like TLS (Transport Layer Security). This ensures that even if data is intercepted during transmission, it cannot be read or altered.

  • Identity and Access Management (IAM): Proper IAM ensures that only authenticated and authorized entities can access the data. This involves implementing robust authentication mechanisms and strictly defining and enforcing permissions and roles for both the CRM system and the public AI system.

  • API Security: APIs are often used to facilitate the interaction between different systems. Securing these APIs is crucial. This includes using API gateways, ensuring proper authentication (e.g., OAuth), rate limiting to prevent abuse, and regularly scanning for vulnerabilities.

  • Data Masking and Redaction: When exchanging data between systems, sensitive information should be masked or redacted. This ensures that even if the data is somehow accessed, the sensitive parts of the data are not exposed.

  • Secure Data Storage: Data at rest should be encrypted, and databases should be properly configured and secured. Access to these databases should be tightly controlled and monitored.

  • Regular Security Audits and Compliance Checks: Regularly auditing the security measures in place and ensuring compliance with relevant standards and regulations (like GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA) can help in identifying potential vulnerabilities and ensuring that the data is handled securely.

  • Network Security Measures: Implementing firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and regularly updating them can protect against potential network-level attacks.

  • End-to-end Security Design: Security should be integrated into the system design from the ground up rather than being an afterthought. This involves understanding the data flow, identifying potential points of vulnerability, and applying the principle of least privilege throughout the system.

  • Data Residency and Sovereignty Considerations: Ensure that data storage and processing locations comply with the legal requirements of the countries where the business operates. This is particularly important for multinational operations where data might cross international borders.

  • Educating Users and Employees: Often, the weakest link in security is human. Regular training and awareness programs for both employees and users about the best security practices, potential threats, and safe handling of data are crucial.

By implementing these measures, organizations can significantly reduce the risk associated with data exchange between public and private cloud-based AI systems, ensuring that the interaction between a private AI for CRM and a public AI system used by individual customers remains secure and trustworthy.



You

Explain how a personal assistant created with ChatGPT Builder and made available in the ChatGPT store would interact with a customer account at Salesforce via Einstein GPT CRM integration with Salesforce. Search the web and tell me about security issues related to ChatGPT Builders and verification of accounts requiring domain verification and personal developer identity security. Cite all sources including complete URLs to source material.



ChatGPT

After a quick search, here's what I found.


Creating a personal assistant using ChatGPT Builder and integrating it with Salesforce via Einstein GPT CRM presents a powerful combination for enhancing customer interaction and service. However, ensuring the security of data exchanged between these systems is paramount.


When a personal assistant developed with ChatGPT Builder interacts with a customer account at Salesforce through Einstein GPT CRM integration, several security considerations come into play. Firstly, developers should ensure that the interaction complies with privacy regulations and corporate security policies. This means implementing strong authentication and authorization measures to verify user identities and control access to sensitive data.


For developers using ChatGPT Builder, understanding and adhering to best security practices is crucial. According to ISACA, leveraging AI like ChatGPT for digital identity verification can introduce a dynamic and interactive element to the verification process. This can be a step up from traditional methods that often rely on static, binary data points. However, this capability also brings the need for heightened scrutiny around digital trust and robust information security​​.


Guildhawk highlights the importance of verifying the source to ensure that you are interacting with a legitimate instance of ChatGPT provided by OpenAI, being cautious with personal information, employing content moderation, and reporting any vulnerabilities to OpenAI. Protecting sensitive information and ensuring data privacy are also emphasized, including practices such as ensuring end-to-end encryption, limiting access and permissions, conducting security audits, obtaining user consent for data collection, and anonymizing data before sending it to ChatGPT​​.


LayerX also discusses the various risks associated with ChatGPT's security vulnerabilities and offers solutions for minimizing those risks. It is important to be aware of the potential for employees to unintentionally input sensitive information into ChatGPT, the possibility of attackers leveraging ChatGPT for phishing attacks or malware development, and the risks of ChatGPT itself being attacked. To mitigate these risks, organizations are advised to develop clear usage policies, conduct training and awareness programs, and use enterprise browser extensions to control the sharing of sensitive data through ChatGPT​​.


Additionally, as per discussions in the OpenAI Developer Forum, becoming a verified builder for the ChatGPT store involves understanding the criteria for verification and following the appropriate application and review process. While detailed information on the process was not available at the time, it underscores the importance of adhering to the platform's guidelines and ensuring that applications meet the expected standards of quality and security​​.


In conclusion, while integrating ChatGPT Builder personal assistants with Salesforce via Einstein GPT CRM offers significant benefits, it is vital to navigate the security landscape carefully. By adhering to best security practices, verifying developer identities, and ensuring robust data protection measures, organizations can safeguard their operations and provide secure, reliable services to their customers.


For more detailed guidance and updates, please visit the respective sources:




You

Write out the complete URLs to the source references.



ChatGPT

Certainly, here are the complete URLs to the sources referenced in the summary:




You

Explain how shadow protocol layered alongside a social media account can be used to generate and spread misinformation in the user's data feed. Write out the complete URLs to the source references.



ChatGPT

Shadow AI or shadow protocol, when discussed in the context of social media, refers to the use of unauthorized or unsanctioned AI tools and techniques that operate outside of an organization's official IT and data management policies. In the realm of social media, such practices can potentially be used to generate and spread misinformation. Here's how a shadow protocol, layered alongside a social media account, might contribute to this issue:


  • Automated Content Creation: Shadow AI can leverage language models similar to GPT-3 to generate convincing, human-like text. This can be used to create seemingly authentic news articles, social media posts, or comments that spread false or misleading information.

  • Profile Mimicking and Amplification: Shadow protocols can create and manage fake social media profiles that mimic real users. These profiles can then interact with content, amplifying the reach of misinformation by liking, sharing, or commenting on posts.

  • Tailored Misinformation: By analyzing user data and engagement patterns, shadow AI can tailor misleading content to specific demographics or individuals, making the misinformation more appealing and believable to the targeted audience.

  • Evasion of Detection: Shadow AI can continuously evolve to evade detection mechanisms that social media platforms put in place to identify and mitigate the spread of misinformation. This might involve altering the messaging or using techniques to make the AI-generated content appear more natural and less like it's coming from a bot.

  • Data Feed Manipulation: Shadow protocols can potentially manipulate the user's data feed directly if they gain unauthorized access to social media algorithms. They could promote certain posts or narratives, ensuring that misinformation appears more prominently in users' feeds.


While these practices demonstrate the potential risks associated with shadow AI in social media, it's crucial to note that the use of such technology for spreading misinformation violates the terms of service of most platforms and may have legal implications.


For detailed information on policies and measures against such practices, you might want to refer to the official resources and guidelines provided by specific social media platforms and regulatory authorities. Unfortunately, I don't have URLs directly related to "shadow protocol" and misinformation as this is a hypothetical application of AI technology and not a recognized or endorsed practice.


Shadow AI or shadow IT refers to the use of information technology systems, devices, software, applications, and services without explicit IT department approval. When applied in the context of social media, a shadow protocol could hypothetically be used to generate and spread misinformation through a user's data feed in several ways:


  • Automated Content Creation: A shadow AI system could be programmed to create posts or content automatically. This content could include misinformation, biased views, or fake news, tailored to be engaging or incite certain reactions.

  • Manipulating Feeds: The AI could be used to infiltrate social media algorithms, manipulating the user's data feed to prioritize certain types of content. This could be done by artificially boosting the engagement metrics of posts containing misinformation, thereby increasing their visibility.

  • Profile Mimicking: Shadow AI could potentially mimic real user profiles to post or share misinformation. This can make the content appear more credible, as it seems to be coming from a legitimate and possibly familiar source.

  • Data Harvesting for Targeting: The AI can harvest user data to understand which types of misinformation are more likely to be believed or shared by certain demographics, and then target these users with tailored false content.

  • Bypassing Security Measures: Since shadow AI operates without the knowledge or consent of IT departments, it may bypass standard security and content moderation protocols established by social media platforms, making it harder to detect and stop the spread of misinformation.


It's important to note that while this scenario is technically feasible, it also raises significant ethical, legal, and security concerns. The use of shadow AI in such a manner would likely violate terms of service of social media platforms, data protection laws, and could potentially have serious societal impacts.


Since this is a speculative scenario, there are no direct references to specific instances of shadow AI being used in this way on social media. However, understanding the potential risks and implications of unauthorized AI usage is crucial for organizations and individuals alike to safeguard against such misuse.







2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

On this day in 2024 - 5/27/2024

Monday 5/27/2024 - On this day in 2024 General Hospital star Johnny Wactor's brave final act revealed: Actor, 37, was shielding female co-worker from armed car thieves when he was shot dead NEWS 5/27/

Comments


bottom of page