Operation Epic Lion
- 17GEN4
- 2 hours ago
- 7 min read
Demands by Iran in their new proposal to the U.S. -
Iran's "new proposal" refers to its 10-point peace plan (also described as a 10-point framework or response), delivered on April 6, 2026, via Pakistani mediators to the U.S. (and indirectly Israel).
This came after Iran rejected a mediator-backed (Egypt-Pakistan-Turkey) 45-day temporary ceasefire proposal and an earlier U.S. 15-point plan (which Iran called “excessively demanding,” “unrealistic,” and “maximalist”). Iran instead insisted on a permanent end to the war rather than any temporary pause.
The full verbatim text of the 10 clauses has not been publicly released by Iranian state media (IRNA), but officials and reporting have consistently outlined the core demands and offers.
Key Iranian Demands (Summarized from the 10-Point Proposal)
Permanent end to the war (not a temporary ceasefire or 45-day pause) across the region.
Security guarantees / formal assurance that Iran will not be attacked again by the U.S. or Israel.
End to Israeli strikes in Lebanon (specifically against Hezbollah and related regional allies).
Lifting of all U.S. and international sanctions on Iran (full sanctions relief).
End to all regional hostilities against Iranian allies/proxies and a broader cessation of conflict in the region.
Reconstruction / reparations mechanism for war damage caused by U.S. and Israeli strikes (Iran has avoided direct cash demands and instead proposed using new revenue streams).
What Iran Offers in Return
Reopen the Strait of Hormuz (lifting its de facto blockade).
Establish a formal protocol / rules for safe passage through the strait (including regulated traffic).
Impose a $2 million fee per ship transiting the strait; Iran would split proceeds with Oman (the country on the opposite shore) and use its share explicitly for reconstruction of damaged infrastructure.
President Trump described the proposal as “a significant step” but “not good enough,” while maintaining his deadline (originally tied to Tuesday evening, April 8, 2026) for reopening the strait or facing strikes on Iranian power plants and bridges.
These details come primarily from Iranian state media (IRNA), senior Iranian officials speaking anonymously, and reporting in outlets such as The New York Times, Al Jazeera, and others covering the mediated exchanges. The exact wording of every clause remains internal to the diplomatic channel, but the above captures the publicly reported substance of Iran’s counter-proposal. The situation remains fluid as of April 7, 2026.
Was this originally an 11 point plan?
No, Iran's recent proposal to the U.S. (delivered April 6, 2026, via Pakistani mediators) has been consistently described across multiple reliable sources as a 10-point plan (or 10-point framework/counter-proposal).
Key reporting from outlets like The New York Times, Al Jazeera, and Iranian state media (IRNA) confirms it consists of 10 clauses. These focus on demands such as a permanent end to the war (not a temporary ceasefire), security guarantees against future attacks, an end to Israeli strikes on Hezbollah in Lebanon, full lifting of U.S. and international sanctions, cessation of regional hostilities against Iranian allies, and reconstruction support—while offering to reopen the Strait of Hormuz with a regulated protocol and a per-ship fee.
There is no indication in current coverage that this specific proposal was originally an 11-point plan. It appears to have been framed and delivered as 10 points from the outset. Iran rejected an earlier U.S.-backed 15-point framework (which included elements like a short-term ceasefire) as "maximalist" and unrealistic, then responded with its own 10-point alternative emphasizing a lasting settlement.
References to "11-point" items in the broader context of Iran-related diplomacy or conflicts typically point to unrelated matters, such as:
Older Iranian statements on UN resolutions (e.g., on Gaza in 2025).
Domestic or historical reform proposals.
Polling shifts or unrelated agreements.
None of these match the April 2026 Hormuz/war-ending proposal. The exact wording of all 10 clauses has not been fully publicized, but the count and core substance have remained steady in reporting as of April 7, 2026.The situation is fast-moving, so future updates could add nuance, but based on available information, it started and remains a 10-point proposal.
The entire 10 point proposal:
The full verbatim text of Iran's 10-point proposal (delivered April 6, 2026, via Pakistani mediators) has not been publicly released by Iranian state media (IRNA) or any official channel. It remains a diplomatic document shared privately with the U.S. through intermediaries.
All available reporting relies on summaries from Iranian officials (some speaking anonymously), IRNA statements, and Western outlets like The New York Times, Al Jazeera, and others that have pieced together the clauses from leaks and briefings. No single source has published the exact wording of all 10 points.
Reconstructed 10-Point Proposal (Based on Consistent Reporting)
Here is the most complete synthesis of the 10 clauses, drawn from multiple overlapping accounts as of April 7, 2026:
Guarantee that Iran will not be attacked again — Formal security assurances from the U.S. and Israel against future military action.
Permanent end to the war — A comprehensive, lasting cessation of hostilities (explicitly rejecting any temporary ceasefire or 45-day pause).
End to Israeli strikes in Lebanon (against Hezbollah and related fronts) and broader cessation of regional conflicts involving Iranian allies.
Lifting of all U.S. and international sanctions on Iran (full sanctions relief).
End to all regional hostilities across West Asia, including mechanisms to prevent escalation involving proxies or other fronts (e.g., references to Gaza/Lebanon in some accounts).
Reconstruction mechanism for war damage — Support for rebuilding affected areas (some accounts frame this as compensation/reparations; Iran has proposed using new revenue streams rather than direct cash payments).
Reopen the Strait of Hormuz — Lift the de facto blockade and restore shipping transit.
Establish a formal protocol/rules for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, including regulated traffic and maritime security arrangements.
Impose a transit fee of roughly $2 million per ship passing through the strait.
Split the fee proceeds with Oman and direct Iran's share toward reconstruction of damaged infrastructure (instead of separate reparations).
Additional Context from Some Reports
Recognition of Iran's sovereignty or rights over aspects of the strait (including potential references to uranium enrichment under the NPT in broader demands).
Withdrawal or limits on U.S. military presence/bases in the region (mentioned in a few accounts but not universally confirmed as one of the core 10).
President Trump described the proposal as a “significant step” but “not good enough,” maintaining pressure ahead of the April 7–8, 2026, deadline tied to reopening the strait. U.S. officials have called elements “maximalist.”
The situation is highly fluid. If the full official text is later released by IRNA or another party, it could provide more precise language. For now, the above reflects the publicly reported substance across credible sources.
Operation Epic Lion - United States and Israel - Iran
March 18, 2026 - Operation Epic Fury is the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM)-led military campaign against Iran, launched on February 28, 2026, at the direction of President Donald J. Trump. It is closely coordinated with Israel’s parallel Operation Roaring Lion. The operation began with large-scale surprise airstrikes and missile attacks targeting Iranian military infrastructure.
Core Objectives
The publicly stated goals (laser-focused per U.S. officials) are:
Destroy Iran’s offensive ballistic missile arsenal and production capacity.
Annihilate the Iranian navy and degrade naval capabilities.
Eliminate support for terrorist proxies (e.g., Hezbollah).
Prevent Iran from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Broader effect: dismantle the regime’s security apparatus and create conditions for internal regime change.
Progress and Projected Timeline (as of March 18, 2026 – Day ~19)
The campaign is ongoing with no fixed end date. U.S. officials describe it as making “decisive progress” toward objectives. Early estimates suggested a core phase of 4–6 weeks (flexible), with Trump noting the U.S. intends to exit “very soon” once key threats are neutralized, while monitoring the Strait of Hormuz closely. CENTCOM’s most recent public video update (March 16) from Adm. Brad Cooper emphasized unrelenting strikes and declining Iranian capabilities.
Key achievements reported:
Missile and production capabilities: Vast majority of Iran’s ballistic missile launchers and offensive capacity degraded or destroyed (U.S./Israeli estimates: 80–90%+; production lines “functionally defeated”). Hundreds of launch sites, storage facilities, and factories hit.
Navy and air assets: Iranian navy largely neutralized (dozens of vessels sunk or destroyed, including frigates); air defenses and air force severely degraded.
Leadership and security apparatus: Multiple senior figures eliminated, including early strike on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and recent Israeli assassinations of security chief Ali Larijani, Basij commander Gholamreza Soleimani, and Intelligence Minister Esmail Khatib.
Nuclear-related sites: Significant damage (set back by years per U.S. assessments); Natanz and other facilities struck.
Overall: Thousands of targets struck (reports range 5,000–7,800+); air superiority achieved; Iranian ability to project power externally heavily curtailed.
Iran’s retaliatory capacity has declined sharply but remains active, with fewer and less accurate launches reported.
Latest Military Activity Updates (March 17–18, 2026)
The conflict remains an intense air/missile/naval campaign with proxy involvement (primarily Hezbollah in Lebanon). No large-scale U.S./Israeli ground invasion of Iran has occurred.
U.S./Israeli actions in Iran:
Continued precision strikes on military sites, command centers, and infrastructure.
Israel conducted first strikes in northern Iran since the war began and hit the South Pars gas field (major escalation; oil/gas prices surged).
Overnight strikes in Tehran and elsewhere confirmed the killings of Esmail Khatib (Intelligence Minister) and other senior officials.
U.S. strikes targeted anti-shipping threats near the Strait of Hormuz (e.g., Kharg Island military sites).
Iranian/Proxy responses:
Multiple missile barrages (including cluster munitions) launched at Israel; impacts reported in central Israel (Tel Aviv/Ramat Gan/Ramla/Bnei Brak areas), killing at least 2 civilians and injuring others.
Hezbollah rocket attacks on northern Israel (e.g., Kiryat Shmona) and engagements in southern Lebanon.
Strikes on Gulf targets: Iranian missiles hit Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG facility (damage reported, no casualties); threats issued to Saudi Arabia, UAE, and others if energy infrastructure is hit again.
Limited Strait of Hormuz disruptions (mines, selective closures, attacks on shipping).
Casualties (reported figures vary by source):
Iran: 1,444–5,300+ killed, ~19,000 wounded (per Iranian Health Ministry and independent monitors).
Israel: Dozens killed/injured in recent barrages (cumulative civilian/military toll in the hundreds).
U.S.: Limited fatalities (several confirmed, including from a KC-135 loss earlier).
Broader regional: Hundreds more across Lebanon, Gulf states, etc.
Economic/Regional notes:
Oil and gas prices elevated due to South Pars/Ras Laffan hits and Hormuz tensions. The situation is fluid and rapidly evolving; U.S. and Israeli officials continue to stress surgical, overwhelming force while Iran vows retaliation.
For real-time developments, official CENTCOM, White House, or IDF statements are the most reliable sources, as events can shift quickly.
Comments