Latest Updates on Dogequest Website and Doxxing Attacks Against Tesla Owners
- 17GEN4

- Mar 19, 2025
- 5 min read
March 19, 2025 – 02:52 PM PDT - The anonymous website known as "Dogequest" has thrust Tesla owners into an unprecedented spotlight. Emerging earlier this week, the site has allegedly published personal information of Tesla owners across the United States, igniting a firestorm of backlash, legal scrutiny, and physical attacks on Tesla properties. As of today, March 19, 2025, the situation remains fluid, with new developments shedding light on the motives, consequences, and responses to this alarming breach of privacy. Here’s what we know so far, alongside the latest updates on this unfolding crisis.
Dogequest surfaced online amid growing tensions surrounding Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his deepening ties to the administration of President Donald Trump. Reports of the website’s existence first began circulating on March 17, 2025, though its exact launch date remains unclear. Describing itself as a hub to "empower creative expressions of protest," Dogequest featured an interactive map purportedly displaying the names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses of Tesla owners nationwide. The site also included locations of Tesla dealerships, Supercharger stations, and personal details of employees linked to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a Musk-led federal agency focused on cutting government spending.
The website’s interface was notably provocative, employing a Molotov cocktail as its cursor—a symbol widely interpreted as a call to action or a nod to the wave of vandalism targeting Tesla properties. Dogequest’s operators stipulated that Tesla owners could request removal of their data, but only upon providing proof of selling their vehicles, a condition many have likened to coercion or blackmail. While the site claimed neutrality, stating it "neither endorses nor condemns any actions," its tone and design suggested an intent to shame or intimidate Tesla owners, amplifying anti-Musk sentiment in an already polarized climate.
Initial investigations by tech outlet 404 Media confirmed that at least some of the data was accurate, with several listed individuals verified as Tesla owners or Musk supporters. However, the full scope and reliability of the database remain uncertain, with some plotted locations failing to align with real-world addresses. The source of the leaked information is another mystery—speculation ranges from public records like DMV databases or property tax filings to a potential breach of Tesla’s own systems, though the company has not reported any such incident.
The emergence of Dogequest coincides with a surge of physical attacks on Tesla vehicles, dealerships, and charging stations across the country, raising fears that the site may be fueling real-world consequences. While no direct evidence links Dogequest to these incidents, the timing and context suggest a broader protest movement against Musk’s political affiliations and Tesla’s brand.
In Las Vegas, on March 18, 2025, a Tesla Collision Center was targeted in what authorities described as a "targeted attack." An individual dressed in black allegedly used Molotov cocktails to set five Tesla vehicles ablaze, spray-painting "RESIST" on the facility’s front door. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department’s counter-terrorism unit is investigating the incident as a possible act of domestic terrorism. Similarly, in Kansas City, two Tesla Cybertrucks were torched in an apparent arson attack, while in South Carolina, an assailant attempting to burn a Tesla charging station accidentally set himself on fire, suffering severe injuries.
Elsewhere, Tesla dealerships have faced gunfire and vandalism. In Oregon, two separate incidents saw bullets shatter windows and damage vehicles at showrooms south of Portland, with no injuries reported. Massachusetts reported multiple Tesla charging stations set ablaze, and in Loveland, Colorado, a woman was arrested earlier this month for hurling an incendiary device at a dealership. These acts, often branded as part of a "Tesla Takedown" movement, reflect a growing hostility that some attribute to Musk’s role in DOGE and his vocal support for Trump’s policies.
Tesla owners, too, have reported increased harassment. Cybertruck drivers, in particular, describe frequent road rage incidents, obscene gestures, and verbal abuse from passersby. One owner, speaking anonymously to 404 Media, expressed fear for their family’s safety after discovering their details on Dogequest, underscoring the personal toll of this campaign.
Elon Musk has not remained silent amid the chaos. On March 18, 2025, he took to X, his social media platform, to denounce Dogequest, writing, "Encouraging destruction of Teslas throughout the country is extreme domestic terrorism!!" During an appearance on Fox News with host Sean Hannity that evening, Musk expressed shock at the "level of hatred and violence" directed at Tesla, questioning the empathy of those he once viewed as aligned with progressive values. "They’re burning down cars, firebombing dealerships, firing bullets into showrooms—it’s just madness," he told Hannity.
The Trump administration has also weighed in. President Trump, who was photographed alongside Musk in a Tesla vehicle on the White House South Lawn on March 11, 2025, has previously suggested that those committing violence against Tesla could be labeled domestic terrorists. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi escalated this rhetoric last week, warning vandals during an appearance on "Mornings with Maria" that they could face up to 20 years in prison. "If you’re going to touch a Tesla, go to a dealership, do anything—you better watch out, because we’re coming after you," Bondi declared, vowing to pursue both perpetrators and their financial backers.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has launched an investigation into Dogequest, focusing on the source of the leaked data and potential legal action against its operators. Cybersecurity experts are assisting in tracing the site’s origins, with early indications suggesting it may have been hosted via a VPN in Canada, though its domain went offline by Wednesday morning, March 19, 2025. Whether this takedown resulted from legal pressure, hosting issues, or voluntary action by its creators remains unclear, though intermittent access issues were reported on Tuesday.
New Developments: Site Goes Dark, Backlash Grows
As of this afternoon, March 19, 2025, the Dogequest website is no longer accessible, marking a significant development in the saga. Social media posts on X indicate that attempts to load the site began yielding errors late Tuesday, with some users speculating it was hit by a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack or pulled by its host following public outcry. By Wednesday morning, the domain appeared defunct, though concerns persist that mirror sites or alternative platforms could resurface with the same data, as Dogequest had encouraged users to create copies of its content.
The site’s brief existence has sparked intense debate. Critics on X and Truth Social have labeled it a modern-day "KKK list" or "Nazi list-making site," with some calling for terrorism charges against its operators. One Tesla owner posted a stark warning: "Whoever owns Dogequest will be responsible for the death of whoever tries to come to my house. I have kids. Remove my name now. First and only warning." Others, however, view it as a form of protest against Musk’s divisive leadership, though this perspective is overshadowed by condemnation of the privacy violation.
Tesla’s corporate response has been limited, with the company yet to issue an official statement on the data leak. However, affected owners are being advised to monitor their personal information and report suspicious activity to authorities. The incident has also reignited calls from early Tesla investor Ross Gerber for Musk to step down as CEO, citing a plummeting stock price—down 33% in the past month—and a tarnished brand reputation. "Sales are plummeting. It’s a crisis," Gerber said in a recent interview. "You literally can’t sell the best product in the marketplace because the CEO is so divisive."
The Dogequest controversy raises pressing questions about data security, online activism, and the intersection of personal safety with corporate leadership. How the site obtained such detailed information remains a critical unknown, with potential implications for Tesla’s cybersecurity practices and the broader vulnerability of consumer data. The ethical limits of protest are also under scrutiny—while Musk’s political involvement has made him a lightning rod, targeting individual Tesla owners crosses a line many find indefensible. 17GEN4.com


Comments