top of page
Search

Kash Patel FBI Locks up J6 Prisoner AGAIN !

  • Writer: 17GEN4
    17GEN4
  • Jul 3
  • 3 min read

Edward Kelley, a 36-year-old former U.S. Marine and January 6 defendant, was sentenced to life in prison on July 2, 2025, for plotting to murder FBI agents who investigated his role in the 2021 Capitol riot. Despite receiving a presidential pardon from Donald Trump in January 2025 for his January 6-related convictions, Kelley faced separate charges in Tennessee for conspiring to attack the FBI’s Knoxville field office and assassinate agents. The pardon, which covered nearly 1,600 January 6 defendants, was ruled not to apply to this murder plot, as it was deemed unrelated in time and place to the Capitol events.


Kelley’s case has sparked controversy, particularly among those who view the FBI’s actions under the Biden administration as overly aggressive. After his initial January 6-related conviction for assaulting a police officer and entering the Capitol (where he was the fourth rioter to breach the building), Kelley served time but was pardoned by Trump upon his return to office in January 2025. Following his release, Kelley claimed the FBI continued to harass and surveil him, including a 2022 raid on his home where agents seized his electronics. This, according to his legal team, fueled his frustration and led to private messages expressing anger, which prosecutors later used against him.


Prosecutors alleged Kelley created a “kill list” of 36 FBI agents and others involved in his January 6 investigation, sharing it with co-conspirator Austin Carter and planning attacks using car bombs and drones. Kelley was convicted in November 2024 of conspiracy to murder federal employees, solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and influencing federal officials by threat. The Justice Department, even under Trump’s second term, sought a life sentence, citing Kelley’s lack of remorse and describing him as a “domestic terrorist.


”Kelley’s defense, led by attorney Mark Brown, argued the case hinged on “little to no planning” and that Kelley was venting political frustration rather than plotting actionable violence. They emphasized that no bombs were built, no agents were harmed, and no direct threats were made. Brown also contested the “terrorism enhancement” applied at sentencing, arguing Kelley’s actions didn’t equate to those of a terrorist responsible for mass casualties. Some sources, like The Gateway Pundit, claim Kelley’s prosecution reflects a Biden-era DOJ vendetta, punishing him for speech rather than actions, especially since his co-defendant, Carter, pleaded guilty and cooperated, yet faces sentencing in August 2025.


Regarding the FBI’s conduct, Kelley’s supporters, including posts on X, allege the agency entrapped him post-pardon by continuing surveillance and provocation, framing his case as retaliation for his January 6 involvement. They point to the 2022 raid and ongoing monitoring as evidence of the FBI “screwing with him,” suggesting it pushed Kelley to express anger in private messages that were later weaponized. However, court records show an informant provided police with Kelley’s “kill list” and videos of FBI agents, indicating his plans went beyond mere venting.


The FBI’s leadership context adds complexity. By July 2025, the agency operates under Trump’s second administration, with figures like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino reportedly influencing its direction. Patel, a Trump loyalist, has criticized the FBI’s “weaponization,” and Bongino, a vocal Trump supporter, has called for reforms to curb alleged overreach. Yet, Kelley’s life sentence suggests the FBI and DOJ, even under this influence, pursued aggressive prosecution, possibly to distance themselves from accusations of leniency toward January 6 figures or to uphold law enforcement’s stance against threats. This contrasts with the Biden-era FBI, which critics like Kelley’s supporters claim targeted conservatives excessively.


Critics of the sentence, including X posts, argue the FBI’s continued surveillance post-pardon provoked Kelley, and his prosecution reflects a double standard, noting that figures like former FBI Director James Comey faced no charges for inflammatory rhetoric. Conversely, prosecutors and FBI Director Christopher Wray emphasized the severity of Kelley’s threats, with agents testifying they lived in fear, requiring security upgrades.


Kelley’s life sentence stems from a serious plot, but his defense and supporters argue the FBI’s post-pardon surveillance and Biden-era DOJ tactics exaggerated his threat level, punishing speech over action. The Patel-Bongino-influenced FBI’s role in 2025 appears to have prioritized law enforcement protection over leniency for a pardoned January 6 defendant, highlighting tensions between reformist rhetoric and institutional priorities.



17GEN4 news



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page