Updated: Oct 4
The secret to success lies in the axiom protocol, or so it seems among the institutional elite.
You have to say one thing while believing another to have influence over large numbers of people.
In other words, it is the understanding that it is your objective to retain your position of power knowing that your sole purpose is to deliver the message regardless of what the message will be. You agree to the terms of service that are subject to change at any time with out notice.
You have to say one thing, knowing, while not revealing that it is the directive, and deliver the message - propaganda.
Audience is achieved by way of the mouthpiece of institutional authority which is obtained by demonstrating an understanding and compliance with axiom protocol. Circular reasoning and logical fallacy that override veracity of the statement demonstrates compliance with axiom protocol.
Lie vs Axiom
The Axiom comes first. An axiom is a lie when it comes first. And a lie is an axiom when it comes first.
A lie is always a response.
The very definition is the lie that comes first
A self-evident truth that requires no proof. A universally accepted principle or rule. Logic, Mathematics. A proposition that is assumed without proof for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it.
A self-evident truth that requires no proof IS NOT a universally understood principle or rule. The true definition is exposed 'for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it.'
Cannot prove a negative, or that something did not happen.
The same applies for the institutional abstraction when defining the social construct of misinformation and disinformation.
The lie, before the convoluted explanations are examined, is that the authoritative interpretation of intent is decided by those in positions of power who achieved their status based on compliance with the axiom protocol. In other words, the figure of authority is merely preoccupied with maintaining their status as their primary motivation.
The axioms built into attempting to contextually reconstruct the deconstruction of language required to propagate the axiom protocol are logical linguistic fallacies such as:
'Misinformation is disinformation that is knowingly spread.' A double negative that requires interpretation of intent. Intent that is determined by an authoritative figure exercising axiom protocol, the objective of which is outlined above - to deliver a message as part of a protocol that simply requires the delivery of the message regardless of the veracity of the claim.
Legal distinction between laws and facts - laws are not necessarily based on facts. Therefore, decisions made from a position of authority granted to an individual based on the demonstration of compliance with the axiom protocol is simply to deliver a desired outcome 'for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it (see above),' are NOT based in fact since they need not be based in fact but subject only to the interpretation or decision (because someone decided) what the law will be subject to variable interpretation or unequal application not based on facts.
You have been misinformed.
You have been accused of spreading disinformation which is merely a subjective interpretation of the facts, but that is irrelevant because it is merely the interpretation of or the decision to carry out a directive and deliver a ruling 'for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it (see above),' regardless of the facts and without consequence as your demonstration of compliance with axiom protocol reserves your authority to do so. Merely a vessel and actually no power whatsoever as there are no consequences for the delivery of false messages or disinformation carried out on behalf of the axiom protocol.
You become part of the protocol as a vessel for delivery of the message regardless of your own personal belief in the message itself and your is to simply deliver the content - you are an influencer working for those who decide what that message will be. There is no power, therefore in having power and the only purpose becomes maintain your status as a useful tool for the axiom protocol.
Inclusivity equity and diversity
You need to include me in your space, then I occupy that space and build the social constructs that I accused you of using to block you out of that same space.
The arena - all of the people entertained by the fight in the arena in Rome are also in an arena that they are unaware of.
Implementing AI axiom, exclusive platforms and utilities
axiom A self-evident truth that requires no proof. A universally accepted principle or rule. Logic, Mathematics. A proposition that is assumed without proof for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it. protocol